In periodontal therapy, much of the long-term prognostic data reported in scientific literature is built upon a fundamental assumption: the patient must maintain excellent plaque control and attend supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) visits consistently.
In real-world clinical practice, however, not all patients follow this ideal behavioral pattern. This discrepancy between theoretical compliance and actual behavior is one of the key reasons why long-term periodontal outcomes can sometimes be less predictable than expected.
Implant therapy, on the other hand, is equally dependent on regular follow-up and maintenance. Without proper monitoring and adherence to SPT, implants may develop serious biological or mechanical complications.
🔵 Key Behavioral Distinction
There is, however, a meaningful difference in patient behavior:
Therefore, when making decisions about the future of a periodontally compromised tooth, evaluating the current biological condition alone is insufficient.
Clinical Implication:
The critical question is not only whether the tissue condition is manageable today, but whether the patient’s future behavior will realistically align with the long-term maintenance demands of the chosen treatment.